If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health (MCP: Digital Health) publishes original research, reviews, narratives of implementation experiences, case studies, commentaries, editorials, multimedia articles for virtual reality and enhanced reality, and other materials. The journal welcomes contributions from authors worldwide. A dedicated and engaged editorial board ensures the highest standards of validity and relevance of its published content through rigorous peer review.
MCP: Digital Health is primarily focused on publishing articles on translation, implementation, adaptation, and validation of digital health solutions, with focus on applications, real-life validations, as well as articles addressing challenges, opportunities, and the future of digital health. As part of the innovative goals, the journal also publishes case studies, implementation experiences, disruptive methods to test efficacy, validity and safety, as well as articles on regulatory issues, entrepreneurship, and commercialization of digital health. MCP: Digital Health welcomes articles related to equity in digital health, digital interventions aimed at social determinants of health, and articles on ethics in digital medicine.
MCP: Digital Health is an online-only, open access journal that - like its parent journal, Mayo Clinic Proceedings - is sponsored by Mayo Clinic.
AN OPEN-ACCESS JOURNAL
Article Publishing Fees
MCP: Digital Health is an open-access, fully electronic journal with no paper edition. There are no subscription fees to individuals or to libraries, and the journal will therefore be accessible permanently without cost to physicians, scientists, governments, and concerned individuals worldwide. The journal is sustained by article publishing fees paid by funding organizations or authors. It is Elsevier policy that open access articles:
Are fully peer reviewed
Are immediately free to access and download from ScienceDirect
Permitted re-use defined by the author's choice of Creative Commons user licenses
Published with CrossMark® to maintain the publication record.
Article publishing fees are incurred only after an article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. More information on publishing fees can be found here: https://www.elsevier.com/about/open-science/open-access. Upon request, we will waive these fees for authors from countries identified by the UN Least Developed Country List and other similar criteria. Please contact the Editorial Office for confirmation about your eligibility to waive the fee: [email protected].
Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a 'Journal Publishing Agreement' (see more information on this). An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author confirming receipt of the manuscript together with a 'Journal Publishing Agreement' form or a link to the online version of this agreement.
As an author you (or your employer or institution) have certain rights to reuse your work. More information.
Elsevier has established a number of agreements with funding bodies which allow authors to comply with their funder's open access policies. Some funding bodies will reimburse the author for the Open Access Publication Fee. After acceptance, open access papers will be published under a noncommercial license. For authors requiring a commercial CC BY license, you can apply after your manuscript is accepted for publication.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) For noncommercial purposes, this license lets others distribute and copy the article, and include it in a collective work (such as an anthology), as long as they credit the author(s) and provided they do not alter or modify the article.
Mayo Clinic Proceedings and MCP: Digital Health are editorially independent. Mayo Clinic Proceedings utilizes a manuscript transfer system designed to provide flexibility and efficiency for you as an author. If a paper is rejected at Mayo Clinic Proceedings, the editors may offer the author(s) the option to transfer the paper to MCP: Digital Health for consideration. This offer may occur during the initial assessment of a manuscript or after receipt of the reviewers' comments.
Within the decision letter from Mayo Clinic Proceedings, the Editor will highlight the option of transferring the manuscript to MCP: Digital Health, and the corresponding author may either accept or decline that offer via a link in the decision letter email. Upon acceptance of the offer, the manuscript is transferred automatically to the new journal.
If the manuscript already has reviewer comments, they are also transferred to MCP: Digital Health along with the manuscript files. The author(s) will be asked to finalize their submission by: 1) revising their manuscript in accord with the reviewers' comments (including uploading a track changes version of the revised manuscript); 2) creating and uploading a point-by-point response to the reviewers' comments; 3) verifying manuscript metadata; 4) uploading ICMJE forms for each author; and 5) reviewing and approving the PDF for submission. After the finalized submission of transferred manuscripts, the Editor will determine whether additional peer review will be necessary. The offer to authors to transfer a manuscript does not guarantee acceptance.
All inquiries regarding journal policy should be directed to the Editorial Office at [email protected].
On the log in page, click the Send Login Details link.
Enter your e-mail address and click the Send Login Details button.
If the system finds a record matching your information, you will receive an email containing your username and a link to change your password. Click the link and follow instructions on the page to create a new password.
Note: If you enter an invalid username/password combination 5 times within 5 minutes, your account will be locked and will not be available for 10 minutes after the fifth failed login attempt. During the lockout period, you may click the Send Login Details link and follow the steps above to recover your username and rest your password.
Once you have successfully logged in, from the Author Main Menu, click Submit New Manuscript to start the submission process. Follow the steps and instructions provided. If you are interrupted during the submission process, your work will automatically be saved and you can return at a later time to finish the submission. Required metadata pertaining to the manuscript include the name, address, and e-mail address of the corresponding author and all contributing authors; affiliated institutions; title of the manuscript; abstract; and key words. Please ensure the accuracy of all e-mail addresses. Authors are required to provide at least 2 preferred reviewers and have the option of providing nonpreferred reviewer names. Mayo Clinic Proceedings reserves the right of final reviewer selection. Once your manuscript has been completely submitted, a manuscript number will be assigned and used in all correspondence. The Editorial Office is automatically notified of the submission and sends an e-mail confirming the submission of the manuscript to the author(s).
Each manuscript submission should designate one corresponding author and all contributing authors. Authorship must be limited to those who have contributed substantially to the design of the study, analysis of the data, and writing of the article. Authors must disclose any potential financial or ethical conflicts of interest regarding the contents of the submission.
Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health accepts no responsibility for manuscripts that are lost or destroyed through electronic or computer problems. Authors are encouraged to keep copies of submitted manuscripts, including figures. If an author does not receive confirmation of submission within 48 hours, he or she should contact the Editorial Office at [email protected]. If notice has not been received, the manuscript has not been completely submitted.
All manuscripts are reviewed by Editorial Board members. Initial editorial reviews usually are completed within 1 to 2 weeks of manuscript submission. Once the Editorial Board review is complete, manuscripts are either forwarded on to peer review or rejected. Before a manuscript is sent for peer review, it is processed through CrossCheck, a text-matching software service.
The time required for review of revised manuscripts varies. Decisions on acceptance or rejection are communicated only by e-mail to the corresponding author. The assigned manuscript number allows authors to view the status of their manuscripts through each step of the process.
Peer Review and Confidentiality
Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health uses a single-blinded review process. Reviewer identities are not, and should not be, disclosed to the authors or other reviewers. In addition, authors should not contact those whom they presume to be reviewers of their manuscript. All contributions will be initially assessed by the editor for suitability for the journal. Papers deemed suitable are then typically sent to a minimum of two independent expert reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the paper. The Editor is responsible for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of articles. The Editor's decision is final. More information on types of peer review.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract, a published lecture or academic thesis, see Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication for more information), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, including electronically without the written consent of the copyright-holder. To verify originality, your article may be checked by the originality detection service Crossref Similarity Check.
For transparency, we encourage authors to submit an author statement file outlining their individual contributions to the paper using the relevant CRediT roles: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Funding acquisition; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Resources; Software; Supervision; Validation; Visualization; Roles/Writing - original draft; Writing - review editing. Authorship statements should be formatted with the names of authors first and CRediT role(s) following https://www.elsevier.com/authors/policies-and-guidelines/credit-author-statement
Potential Competing Interests
All authors must disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work. Examples of potential competing interests include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Authors must disclose any potential competing interests in two places: 1. A summary potential competing interests statement in the manuscript file. If there are no interests to declare then please state this: Potential Competing Interests: The authors report no competing interests. This summary statement will be ultimately published if the article is accepted. 2. Detailed disclosures as part of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest statement, which is part of the journal's official records. It is important for potential competing interests to be declared in both places and that the information matches. More information.
All authors are required to complete an (ICMJE) Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest form. ICMJE conflict of interest forms should be uploaded at submission by the corresponding author. Authors should also include all financial support of the research and conflict of interest disclosures on the title page of the manuscript.
Role of the Funding Source
You are requested to identify who provided financial support for the conduct of the research and/or preparation of the article and to briefly describe the role of the sponsor(s), if any, in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. If the funding source(s) had no such involvement, then this should be stated. Please see https://www.elsevier.com/funding.
After acceptance, open access papers will be published under a noncommercial license. For authors requiring a commercial CC BY license, you can apply after your manuscript is accepted for publication.
Elsevier has established agreements and developed policies to facilitate author compliance with manuscript archiving requirements incorporated into many grant awards. To learn more about existing agreements and policies please visit https://www.elsevier.com/fundingbodies.
Human and Animal Research
All human studies must contain a statement within the Patients and Methods section indicating that the study has been approved by an institutional review board and that participants have signed written informed consent or that the institutional review board has waived the need for informed consent. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health does not publish manuscripts on animal research.
Registration of Clinical Trials
Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health requires registration for all clinical trials submitted for publication. Trials that start enrollment after July 1, 2008, should be registered before starting patient enrollment. Clinical trials will need to be registered in 1 of the 5 registries accepted by the ICMJE or in any of the primary registries that participate in the WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform. For additional information, please see http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/publishing-and-editorial-issues/clinical-trial-registration.html.
Authors are expected to consider carefully the list and order of authors before submitting their manuscript and provide the definitive list of authors at the time of the original submission. Any addition, deletion or rearrangement of author names in the authorship list should be made only before the manuscript has been accepted and only if approved by the journal Editor. To request such a change, the Editor must receive the following from the corresponding author: (a) the reason for the change in author list and (b) written confirmation (e-mail, letter) from all authors that they agree with the addition, removal or rearrangement. In the case of addition or removal of authors, this includes confirmation from the author being added or removed.
Only in exceptional circumstances will the Editor consider the addition, deletion or rearrangement of authors after the manuscript has been accepted. While the Editor considers the request, publication of the manuscript will be suspended. If the manuscript has already been published in an online issue, any requests approved by the Editor will result in a corrigendum.
Language (usage and editing services) Please write your text in good English (American or British usage is acccepted, but not a mixture of these.) Authors who feel their English language manuscript may require editing to eliminate possible grammatical or spelling errors and to conform to correct scientific English may wish to use the English Language Editing service available from Elsevier's WebShop.
Elsevier Publishing Campus The Elsevier Publishing Campus (http://www.publishingcampus.com) is an online platform offering free lectures, interactive training and professional advice to support you in publishing your research. The College of Skills training offers modules on how to prepare, write and structure your articles and explains how editors will look at your paper when it is submitted for publication. Use these resources, and more, to ensure that your submission will be the best you can make it.
Authors should prepare manuscripts in accordance with the "Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals," developed by the ICMJE (https://www.icmje.org). Reports of randomized controlled trials should include the CONSORT checklist and flow diagram. Templates for these can be found here or on the CONSORT website (https://www.consort-statement.org) which also describes several CONSORT checklist extensions for different designs and types of data beyond two group parallel trials. At minimum, your article should report the content addressed by each item of the checklist. For other required reporting guidelines, please visit the Equator Network. Specific requirements for Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health follow.
The manuscript should be typed in 12-point type and double-spaced throughout, and should be arranged as follows: (1) title page, (2) abstract, (3) alphabetical list of abbreviations used at least 3 times in the body of the manuscript (exclusive of abstract, figures, and tables) and their expansions, (4) text with appropriate headings and conclusion, (5) acknowledgments, (6) references, (7) legends, (8) tables (with alphabetical list of all abbreviations and their expansions as a footnote), and (9) illustrations (with separate alphabetical list of abbreviations and their expansion in legend). Manuscript pages should be numbered consecutively and labeled with the last name of the first author. The text portion of the manuscript should be saved using a word-processing program, such as a .doc or .rtf file format.
Tables should be created using your word processor's table function. Tables can be placed at the end of your manuscript document or saved as separate files.
Line art, including graphs and algorithms (flow charts), should be created and submitted in PowerPoint. Halftone and color images should be saved in Photoshop in .jpg, .gif, or .tiff format at 300 dpi. Figures should not be inserted or embedded into the manuscript document; rather, they should be saved and uploaded as separate files.
Title: Formulate a title that reflects the content of the article. Avoid declarative statements, questions, and titles that tantalize but do not inform readers. For improved discoverability, please include important key words in your title as appropriate. Authors: Include first names and middle initials, academic degrees, departmental affiliations and institutions, and current departmental and institutional affiliations for authors who have relocated since completion of the study. Financial support and conflict of interest disclosure: List all financial and material support for the research and work described in the manuscript (eg, grant number and funding agency for the project, an individual author, or both). Each author must disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work. When in doubt, please disclose. If there are no conflicts of interest, please provide a statement to that effect for each author. Reprints and correspondence: Include name, address, and e-mail address of author to whom post publication correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed. Please see the following for all author's rights information to sharing your article: https://www.elsevier.com/authors/journal-authors/submit-your-paper/sharing-and-promoting-your-article.
Abstracts should be no more than 250 words.
For Original Articles:
Organize abstract in a structured format, with the following headings: Objective, Patients and Methods, Results, and Conclusion.
Ensure that information in each section of the abstract is in the corresponding section of the text.
Begin the "Objective" section of the Abstract with the word "To" and then state why you performed the study. Objective should not exceed one sentence.
In the Patients and Methods section of the Abstract and of the text, please provide the complete dates of the study, eg, January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2002.
Please provide the Clinical Trials registration number at the end of the Abstract, if applicable.
For other contributions, abstracts should not be structured.
Express measurements in conventional units, giving conversion factor to SI units on first mention.
Give exact P values, even if they are nonsignificant. Style as P=.02 (italic letter, closed up, no initial zero). The lowest P value we report is P<.001. Round P values to 2 digits, except for the values in which the first 2 or 3 numbers after the decimal point are zeroes, then round to 3 or 4 digits, respectively. For P values that are less than .001 use P<.001.
Avoid specialized jargon and abbreviations; abbreviate a term only if it is used at least 3 times in text (exclusive of abstract, tables, and figures) and define at first mention.
Use generic names for drugs and equipment.
Do not use footnotes within the text.
For genetic nomenclature, please follow the recommendations of the Human Genome Organisation. Approved gene symbols, descriptions, and older aliases can be searched at http://www.genenames.org.
The corresponding author must provide assurance in writing that permission has been obtained from those acknowledged.
Authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of their references and for their complete and accurate citation in the text.
Cite references, figures, and tables consecutively as they appear in the text; use superscript numerals for text citations. Tables and Figures (including Supplemental eTables and eFigures) are considered part of text and so citations are numbered consecutively with those in text. Example: If Table 1 contains references, and the reference number in the text before citation of Table 1 is 5, a reference in Table 1 would become reference 6; the next reference cited in manuscript after table call-out would be cited as reference 7.
Cite personal communications (specify oral or written) and unpublished data parenthetically in the text and include date (do not list in references). The corresponding author must provide assurance in writing that permission has been obtained from those acknowledged.
In the reference list, include names and initials of all authors (if more than 6, list 3 followed by "et al"), the title, source (journal abbreviations should conform to those in Index Medicus), year, volume, issue, and expanded page ranges. For appropriate reference style, refer to a recent issue of the journal http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org or the American Medical Association Manual of Style: A Guide for Authors and Editors, 10th ed. New York, NY; Oxford University Press; 2007:39-79.
Data references. This journal encourages you to cite underlying or relevant datasets in your manuscript by citing them in your text and including a data reference in your Reference List. Data references should include the following elements: author name(s), dataset title, data repository, version (where available), year, and global persistent identifier. Add [dataset] immediately before the reference so we can properly identify it as a data reference. This identifier will not appear in your published article.
Journals (Print) 1. Rainier S, Thomas D, Tokarz D, et al. Myofibrillogenesis regulator 1 gene mutations cause paroxysmal dystonic choreoathetosis. Arch Neurol. 2004;61(7):1025-1029. Journals (Online) 2. Duchin JS. Can preparedness for biologic terrorism save us from pertussis? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(2):106-107. Available at http://archpedi.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/158/2/106. Accessed June 1, 2004. Journals (Published Online Ahead of Print) 3. Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al; Pravastatin or atorvastatin evaluation and infection therapy-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 22 Investigators. intensive vs moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes [published online ahead of print March 8, 2004]. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(15):1495-1504. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040583. Chapter 4. Bithell TC. Hereditary coagulation disorders. In: Lee GR, Bithell TC, Foerster J, Athens JW, Lukens JN, eds. Wintrobe's Clinical Hematology. Vol 2. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger; 1993:1422-1472. Book 5. Guyton AC. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 1991:255-262. Web 6. International Society for Infectious Diseases. ProMED-mail website. http://www.promedmail.org. Accessed April 29, 2004. Dataset references 7.Oguro, M, Imahiro, S, Saito, S, Nakashizuka, T. Mortality data for Japanese oak wilt disease and surrounding forest compositions, Mendeley Data, v1; 2015. https://doi.org/10.17632/xwj98nb39r.1.
Number tables consecutively (with Arabic numerals) in the order of their citation in the text.
Type all tabular material double-spaced; each table should be on a separate page.
Provide a title for each table; define all abbreviations used in each table in a footnote.
Superscripted lowercase letters (a-z) should be used for table footnotes.
Do not submit tables as images.
Cite all illustrations in the text and number them (with Arabic numerals) in the order of their appearance.
Provide a legend for each figure as part of the manuscript document. Include definitions of any abbreviations that appear on the figure, along with any permissions noted, and an appropriate citation.
For photomicrographs, specify stain and original magnification.
For any illustration with a recognizable patient, submit a release form signed by the patient.
Do not trim illustrations or assemble component parts.
We do not publish pie charts; three-dimensional figures are not acceptable; hatching should be avoided on bar graphs.
Line art, including graphs and algorithms (flow charts), should be created in PowerPoint.
Halftone and color images should be saved in Photoshop in .jpg, .gif, or .tiff format at 300 dpi.
Illustrations borrowed from a source not copyrighted by Mayo Foundation require permission and credit line information from the publisher. See "Permissions" below.
Any figures submitted in color will appear in color in print and online at no additional charge to the author.
Please do not:
Supply files that are optimized for screen use (e.g., GIF, BMP, PICT, WPG); the resolution is too low.
Supply files that are too low in resolution.
Submit graphics that are disproportionately large for the content.
Manipulation of Images
Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health follows Elsevier's policy on manipulation of images (https://www.elsevier.com/author-schemas/artwork-and-media-instructions). No specific feature within an image may be enhanced, obscured, moved, removed, or introduced. Adjustments of brightness, contrast, or color balance are acceptable if and as long as they do not obscure or eliminate any information present in the original. Manipulating images for improved clarity is accepted, but manipulation for other purposes could be seen as scientific ethical abuse and will be dealt with accordingly. (Rossner and Yamada, 2004. The Journal of Cell Biology, 166, 11-15. http://jcb.rupress.org/content/166/1/11.full).
Use of previously published graphic and tabular material is strongly discouraged.
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission for reuse of material (illustrations, tables, or lengthy quotes) from other sources, including adaptations. The preferred and quickest method for obtaining permission is via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Permission letters from the copyright holder of the original source (along with complete bibliographic information) must be submitted with the manuscript. Failure to provide all appropriate permissions will delay publication or may necessitate the omission of a figure or table for which permission has not been received.
Publication of supporting material is at the discretion of the Editorial Board. Supplemental material will not be edited by the journal office, and it is the author's responsibility to ensure the accuracy of the data and the clarity of the format. Once accepted for publication, authors will not be provided an opportunity to review or modify supplemental material.
Use the headings Supplemental Table, Supplemental Figure, or Supplemental Appendix for your supporting material, and save and upload a PDF version of this material.
The following disclaimer is listed on the Journal's website: Supplemental material attached to journal articles has not been edited, and the authors take responsibility for the accuracy of all data.
Authors are responsible for ensuring the following:
Data (including percentages) are accurate and consistent with those cited in the manuscript.
Permission from the original publisher is obtained and sent to the journal office for any borrowed material. The works from which figures or tables are borrowed should be cited in the reference list. A credit line should be added to the figure legend or after the table footnotes in the following format: "From Title of Journal,1 with permission."
Supplemental figures and tables meet the same formatting specifications as those for the print journal. For example, three-dimensional figures are not acceptable, hatching should be avoided on bar graphs, and pie charts are not acceptable. Do not submit tables as images.
All online supplemental material is correctly called out in the body of the manuscript in the appropriate location (eg, Supplemental Table 1, Supplemental Figure 1, Supplemental Appendix 1).
All references cited in the online supplement are included in the reference list of the manuscript and are cited in order (based on the first occurrence of the callout to that supplemental document). Proper format for citing reference in table or figure: Smith et al,14 2010.
A title for each table and a legend for each figure are provided and all abbreviations are expanded in the table footnote or figure legend.
Table footnotes should be superscripted lowercase letters (a-z).
From your Author Main Menu, locate the Submissions Needing Revision folder. Locate the appropriate manuscript and use the Action links to respond.
All accepted manuscripts are edited according to the American Medical Association Manual of Style: A Guide for Authors and Editors, 10th ed. New York, NY; Oxford University Press; 2007, and the corresponding author will receive an approval copy of the page proofs before publication.
Early View Articles
Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health, publishes articles ahead of their assembly into published issues. All articles published are in final format and have been approved by the author(s) and editors prior to release to the website. Articles receive a unique DOI (Digital Object Identifier) number that facilitates searches of electronic databases. The official publication date is the date of electronic publication. These articles are published in a subsequent online issue of the Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health.
Journal corresponding authors will receive a free PDF of their own articles for personal use only. A form for ordering paper reprints will accompany the author acknowledgement e-mail from the Publisher.
The corresponding author will, at no cost, receive a customized Share Link providing 50 days free access to the final published version of the article on ScienceDirect. The Share Link can be used for sharing the article via any communication channel, including email and social media. For an extra charge, paper offprints can be ordered via the offprint order form which is sent once the article is accepted for publication. Both corresponding and co-authors may order offprints at any time via Elsevier's Webshop. Corresponding authors who have published their article open access do not receive a Share Link as their final published version of the article is available open access on ScienceDirect and can be shared through the article DOI link.
All information regarding the content and publication date of accepted manuscripts is confidential. Information contained in or about accepted articles cannot appear in any media outlet (print, broadcast, or electronic) until online publication.
Reference Management Software
Most Elsevier journals have their reference template available in many of the most popular reference management software products. These include all products that support Citation Style Language styles, such as Mendeley and Zotero, as well as EndNote. Using the word processor plug-ins from these products, authors only need to select the appropriate journal template when preparing their article, after which citations and bibliographies will be automatically formatted in the journal's style. If no template is yet available for this journal, please follow the format of the sample references and citations as shown in this Guide.
Guidelines for the most frequent types of articles submitted to the journal are summarized below. Specific limits for word count, references, tables, and figures are provided in table format for quick reference. Authors are required to include the word count of the text, and the number of references, tables, and figures, on the Title page of the manuscript.
These include prospective clinical trials, laboratory research, population-based studies, retrospective analyses, meta-analyses, and related research. Priority for publication is given to those manuscripts with original and novel findings, particularly related to the clinical care of patients, implementation research and studies testing real-life effects of digital health solutions. In addition to peer review, original manuscripts will undergo statistical review by either a master's or doctorate degree statistician.
A meta-analysis is defined as a study that includes statistical pooling (combining) of data from individual studies. Meta-analyses require submission of the PRISMA checklist and the PRISMA flow chart depicting the process of study selection. These documents are required for submission but do not have to necessarily be published. Meta-analyses require a structured abstract that follows the standard MCP: Digital Health headings.
These consist of a critical assessment of literature and existing data. Priority for publication is given to topics with relevance to contemporary topics in digital health, applications focused on improvement in health care delivery, diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions. Authors are strongly encouraged to describe within the abstract and manuscript text the methods used to focus their search of the literature (eg, PubMed, MEDLINE), the search terms used, and the date limitations of the search. Also, please indicate how studies were selected for inclusion in the review. Provide 3-5 article highlights. These points should emphasize why our audience should read your article, describe what is new or cutting edge, and how it is of interest to your colleagues. The manuscripts most competitive for publication will introduce novel ideas or will address topics of importance to large numbers of patients, clinicians and scientists, provide a state of the art review of digital health solutions already available or close to be available, evolving technological issues, or mechanistically important topics. MCP: Digital Health is not interested in publishing material that can be readily obtained from existing book chapters or topics that have recently been published in other large-circulation medical journals.
A systematic review is defined as a review that followed an explicit a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria and comprehensive database search. Systematic reviews require submission of the PRISMA checklist and the PRISMA flow chart depicting the process of study selection. These documents are required for submission but do not have to necessarily be published. Systematic reviews require a structured abstract that follows the standard MCP headings.
Reviews that do not fit the criteria of systematic reviews and meta-analyses do not require PRISMA checklist or figure and require only a nonstructured abstract, along with the 3 to 5 article highlights
The Editorial Board can solicit a review on any topic, and in any format, deemed appropriate, as determined by a needs-assessment analysis. In general, topics are solicited for their importance and timeliness, and authors are invited based on their expertise. Even after manuscripts are solicited, acceptance for publication is at the discretion of the Editorial Board. Hence, even though the acceptance rate for a solicited review would be expected to be greater than for unsolicited material, acceptance of solicited reviews is neither guaranteed nor universal.
This contribution will be generally written by a large group of authors who are experts in the field and who base their recommendations on a thorough survey of the existing literature and on their collective expertise in cutting-edge approaches to develop, test, validate or implement digital health solutions. This type of article will be most valuable if it addresses evolving or controversial topics and if authored by recognized authorities or authoritative groups.
Designation as a Special Article is at the discretion of the Editorial Board. In general, Special Articles address important, evolving, highly visible, and often controversial topics. Individual articles may contain an amalgam of literature review, new original data, and speculative synthesis, with some opportunity for injecting the authors' opinions. As such, the article content may be more closely aligned with the Original Articles or Reviews, but with some features of Editorials or Commentaries.
Commentaries are intended to offer expert insights into important or controversial topics related to artificial intelligence, medical informatics, mobile health, telemedicine, platform care, or related issues. When appropriate, the Editorial Board expects authors to acknowledge a limited amount of supporting or opposing literature. Priority is given to novel thought, clear and creative writing, and the relevance of the manuscript to the interests of MCP-Digital Health readers.
Perpectives and Controversies
This type of article provides a succinct and appealing discussion of a topic that is either important, timely, or controversial. A Perspective is intended to highlight and stimulate thinking and discourse on such a topic, and may do so either by: discussing and elucidating it; challenging and refuting widely accepted views pertaining to it; or by combining both approaches. The topic may involve any aspect of current understanding of digital health methods and limitations; regulatory issues, ethical aspects related to the use of digital health, effect of digital health solutions on equity and inclusion, public policy and commercialization of digital health solutions. These articles are less than 1500 words in length, and include no more than 10 references. Authors of this type of article should have relevant knowledge and understanding of the field and would be generally limited to 3 authors. All articles in this category would undergo editorial review prior to acceptance.
This type of article is intended to provide a forum to publish use cases and implementation experiences of digital health solutions, whether they were positive or negative. These articles are meant to be descriptive in nature, although authors are encouraged to provide details regarding the planning of their implementation, the tool, algorithm, or system that was implemented, a description of the setting, and how outcomes where assessed. It is assumed that these articles will not have comparative groups or require a statistical analysis, but mostly descriptors of aggregate numbers or subjects. Narratives on experiences where results where unexpected or brought up unanticipated consequences, positive or negative, are strongly encouraged.
A Brief Report will typically address an early report or observation of relevance to digital health. This category is not intended to present preliminary data on structured, ongoing research or to replace a Narrative article described above, but instead is intended to present extremely novel observations that may encourage others to perform related research or reassess their current projects.
Submission of Editorials is by invitation from, or prior arrangement with, the Editorial Board. Most Editorials will comment on other material (eg, an innovative original article) appearing in the same issue of the journal or on changes in journal activities or policies. "Freestanding" editorials that comment on other topics, such as major changes in digital health, not originally introduced within the pages of the MCP: Digital Health, are also published. Final acceptance of any Editorial, even an invited Editorial, is at the discretion of the Editorial Board.
A video article will be the desirable format for scientific reports related to virtual reality, augmented reality or extended reality. The authors will have the opportunity to describe the background, methods and main results in a traditional written format, but the core of the article will be the immersive experience readers can obtain through the video.
Video Article Submissions
A Video Article must be no longer than 10 minutes in length and will be published in mp4 format only. The preferred format for submission and peer-review is .mp4; however, the following formats are all acceptable for submission: mpg or mov. Please note that Elsevier will convert other acceptable formats to mp4 for publication, at which point the maximum file size is 150 MB.
Video Articles require the author(s) to submit a title page listing all author's and the corresponding author's full name, degree(s), and affiliations, along with an unstructured structured abstract of 250 words maximum as well as a Video that is accompanied by narration. Narration must be in English and should not contain background music. Video Articles may contain images, graphs, and/or statistics to support or demonstrate the findings of the Video Article (cartoons and animations should include permissions for reuse if borrowed, as appropriate). A list of Requirements and additional details are provided below.
Length: No more than 10 minutes in length.
Video formats: Please submit the highest quality video possible. In order to ensure that your video is directly usable, please provide the files in one of our recommended file formats with a preferred maximum size of 150MB. We prefer mp4 or windows media files, but other acceptable formats are MPG, or MOV. Please submit your video files in 1080P. We accept 720P, but prefer higher resolution. For more information, please see the video instructions
Please provide a video still image file as well. This is the placeholder online and in print. A still photograph (formatted as described for the video) must be included with your submission (it can be any frame from the video or may be a separate image) - this will be used as an "icon" for the video link
An unstructured abstract of 250 words maximum must accompany the video
Highlights (similar to that required for a manuscript) must be included with the video submission
The maximum number of figures/tables is no more than 3 total
The maximum number of references that can accompany the video submission is 25
Keep Video article title concise and informative. Titles are often used in information-retrieval systems. Avoid abbreviations and formulae where possible.
Commercial-type messages should not be used.
Work must be original and not published elsewhere, and all portions of the video clips must be the property of the author(s).
Informed consent and patient details: Video Articles containing patients or volunteers require ethics committee approval and informed consent, which should be documented. Appropriate consents, permissions and releases must be obtained where an author wishes to include case details or other personal information or video/images of patients and any other individuals in an Elsevier publication. Written consents must be retained by the author and copies of the consents or evidence that such consents have been obtained must be provided to Elsevier on request. For more information, please review the Elsevier Policy on the Use of Images or Personal Information of Patients or other Individuals, https://www.elsevier.com/patient-consent-policy. Unless you have written permission from the patient (or, where applicable, the next of kin), the personal details of any patient included in any part of the Video Article must be removed before submission.
Letters to the Editor
The Editor welcomes letters and comments, particularly pertaining to recently published articles in MCP: Digital Health, as well as letters reporting original observations and research. Letters pertaining to a recently published MCP: Digital Health article should be received no later than 1 month after the article's publication. It is assumed that appropriate letters submitted to the Editor will be published, at the Editor's discretion, unless the writer indicates otherwise. Priority is given for the importance of the message, novelty of thought, and clarity of presentation. The Editor reserves the right to edit letters in accordance with MCP: Digital Health style and to abridge them if necessary.
Use of inclusive language
Inclusive language acknowledges diversity, conveys respect to all people, is sensitive to differences, and promotes equal opportunities. Content should make no assumptions about the beliefs or commitments of any reader; contain nothing which might imply that one individual is superior to another on the grounds of age, gender, race, ethnicity, culture, sexual orientation, disability or health condition; and use inclusive language throughout. Authors should ensure that writing is free from bias, stereotypes, slang, reference to dominant culture and/or cultural assumptions. We advise to seek gender neutrality by using plural nouns ("clinicians, patients/clients") as default/wherever possible to avoid using "he, she," or "he/she." We recommend avoiding the use of descriptors that refer to personal attributes such as age, gender, race, ethnicity, culture, sexual orientation, disability or health condition unless they are relevant and valid. When coding terminology is used, we recommend to avoid offensive or exclusionary terms such as "master", "slave", "blacklist" and "whitelist". We suggest using alternatives that are more appropriate and (self-) explanatory such as "primary", "secondary", "blocklist" and "allowlist". These guidelines are meant as a point of reference to help identify appropriate language but are by no means exhaustive or definitive.
Data Sharing Policy
At this time authors are asked to state if data will be shared and provide an explanation if data cannot be shared.